What do you guys think of these new servers?

So far I've only tried the Epic Battles (large vehicle conquest maps) and I'm enjoying that one.

In between the BF3 Classics only, and Most Popular, one of those has TDM in the mix and I'm not sure I like that idea. Though I'm thinking the one with just Conquest and Rush might be real fun, I definitely want to try it.

Nash wrote:

So far I've only tried the Epic Battles (large vehicle conquest maps) and I'm enjoying that one.

In between the BF3 Classics only, and Most Popular, one of those has TDM in the mix and I'm not sure I like that idea. Though I'm thinking the one with just Conquest and Rush might be real fun, I definitely want to try it.

The only one I don't like so far is the B2K maps only servers. Other than that, I like all the gametypes, so I don't mind playing on servers with rotating gametypes.

B2K Conquest are pretty cool, besides that, all conquest!

Party dominate Conquest and Rush servers!!!!

I tried out the "Most popular" server and I absolutely loved it!

Tbh I was completely unaware of the new servers untill today

After last nights scrims,
I definitely like the Epic Battle servers.

I actually like the way the have separated the servers, the only flaw is that they mixed TDM, rush, and conquest all in the same servers in some of them. Also when you join through the quick match now it will put you in one of those gay servers with multiple game modes. They also should have kept servers with the normal rotation.

I think the servers are pretty good. I really don't care what game mode I play and how often. I'll find a way to have fun regardless. I see most of you hate TDM, but I'm a fan of it. Helps me rack up G18 kills and dog tags.

I don't hate TDM as much as I make out I do, I mean TDM is a classic you gotta like it some how, I just think it's weird with Battlefield. And you know for damn sure they only put that in to attract the attention of some CoD fans, which really ended up killing Conquest now because people don't fucking PTFO.

Nash wrote:

I don't hate TDM as much as I make out I do, I mean TDM is a classic you gotta like it some how, I just think it's weird with Battlefield. And you know for damn sure they only put that in to attract the attention of some CoD fans, which really ended up killing Conquest now because people don't fucking PTFO.

I agree, it is kind of awkward in Battlefield, but it's definitely not bad at all. IMO, it's actually really fun because you can use whatever class you want/whatever gun you want, and it won't effect the overall outcome of the game (but in objective games, most of the time you need to have a lot of engineers to take out vehicles, etc, so some people get stuck playing a class they didn't want to play).

And people not playing the objective has always been a problem in almost every shooter (at least on console), Battlefield definitely included (at least from my experience, and I've played all the Battlefields since BF2: Modern Combat). The only way to make a game where EVERYBODY focuses on taking the objective to win is to take the "Kills" sections off of the leaderboards, and don't show players their K/D. Other than that, people will always stat-whore.

What annoys me on the ones that do rush/CQ is that its only 1 round of rush, thats my only quirm

Coopy wrote:

What annoys me on the ones that do rush/CQ is that its only 1 round of rush, thats my only quirm

That actually is pretty stupid.. not quite sure what they were thinking there. Definitely need to attack and defend to call it a match of Rush.

Hope they change that with the update.

and the worst thing is, the way the maps rotate, even when you get back to the good rush maps, your constantly either attacker or defender, unless you switch side

Coopy wrote:

and the worst thing is, the way the maps rotate, even when you get back to the good rush maps, your constantly either attacker or defender, unless you switch side

hahaha wow, they obviously didn't think that out too well.

Urban Warfare are my favorite servers

Always loved infantry maps